Rothken Law Firm

Class Actions, Civil Litigation, & High Technology Law
  • —  Home
  • Contact
Subscribe
  • Home RSS
Search
Case Assistance

Palm Treo 600 and 650 Notice of Class Action Settlement (Palza Case)
treocst.gifIf you purchased a Palm Treo 600 or Treo 650 in the United States and found it to be defective click here to tell us what happened, enter yor information into our database, and possibly participate in a current class action case. To view the Notice of Class Action Settlement please visit the Palza Settlement Web Site.


---->Click here to suggest a new Case

 

Case Documents of Interest

Free Speech Coalition v. Utah Complaint (alleging federal preempted e-mail registry statute)

Palza v. Palm, Inc.
Class Action Complaint (alleging inherently defective Treo PDA devices and breach of warranties)

Parke v. Cardsystems Solutions, Inc. Class Action Complaint (alleging negligent data security of consumer credit card transactions)

Cisneros v. Yahoo et al Class Action Complaint (Net Gambling Ads)

Baker v. Microsoft et al
Complaint on behalf of the General Public (Consumer Software Shrinkwrap Agreements and Return Policies)

Judnick v. DoubleClick Nationwide Class Action Settlement (Alleged Privacy Intrusions Related to Web Bugs and Tracking Consumer Internet Activities)

In re RIAA
Complaint and Settlement on behalf of the General Public (Amnesty Program Alleged a Deceptive Business Practice)

Newmark v. Turner Broadcasting et al.
Complaint, Oral Argument Transcript, and Court Order in Favor of Consumers
(ReplayTV Case Involving Commercial Skipping, Time Shifting, and Space Shifting on DVR Devices)

Retailers National Bank et al. (Visa and Mastercard) v. Harding
Cross Complaint (Alleging Internet Gambling Credit Card Debts are Unenforceable)

Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Notice

The information supplied on this web site is general in nature and should not be relied upon to make legal decisions. Interacting with e-mail, forms, or online forums on this web site does not constitute the creation of an attorney/client relationship. This web site is an advertisement for legal services. The examples of client cases and results discussed on this web site are not a guarantee of your outcome if we represent you in a particular case. 

Login
  • Login
« RecordTV.com defends itself against the MPAA | Main | First Consumer privacy lawsuit filed against DoubleClick »

California's bulk e-mail statute questioned in class action case

Posted on Friday, June 9, 2000 at 11:52PM by Registered CommenterAdmin in Law Firm News | Comments Off

A California state law aimed at reining in unsolicited bulk email is unconstitutional, a judge ruled this week.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Copyright © 2008, Rothken Law Firm LLP and Ira P. Rothken, Esq. and its Licensors. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Techfirm, Techfirm.com, and OnlineAttorney are trademarks and service marks of Rothken Law Firm LLP

3 Hamilton Landing Suite 280 Novato, CA 94949 415-924-4250 .