Digital Currency

 

 

Contact Us
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Featured Audio

    Techdirt Interview of Ira Rothken
    -Discussion of Ira Rothken's career handling internet copyright cases

    February 23, 2012 Radio New Zealand
    -US abuse of power in taking down Megaupload
    -No such thing as criminal secondary copyright infringement
    -The Prosecution is politically motivated 

    Ira Rothken presentation at e-discovery seminar (excerpt)
    - discussion of technical-legal factors to consider in determining whether e-discovery related data is "not reasonably accessible"
    - More information can be found here 
     

    Featured Videos

    Bloomberg

    Documentary Extras
    Kim Dotcom: Caught
    in the Web

    Selected Talks and Interviews

    Photos

    Search
    Twitter Alerts
    Investigation Tips
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      News Index
      Notice

      The information supplied on this web site is general in nature and should not be relied upon to make legal decisions. Interacting with e-mail, forms, or online forums on this web site does not constitute the creation of an attorney/client relationship. This web site is an advertisement for legal services. The examples of client cases and results discussed on this web site are not a guarantee of your outcome if we represent you in a particular case. 

      Login

      Megaupload and Kim Dotcom Case Current Events

      60 Minutes Interview of Ira Rothken by Bob Simon regarding government abuse of Kim Dotcom


      Bloomberg Interview with Ira P. Rothken on the Megaupload/Kim Dotcom case discussing Court Order finding illegal government conduct

       

      Read what Steve Wozniak thinks about Kim Dotcom and the Megaupload case in this CNET News.com article

      Thursday
      Jun212012

      Megaupload Files Reply Brief in the United States Urging Dismissal

      Megaupload filed a reply brief today asking the US Court to permit a limited appearance and to dismiss the criminal case arguing, amongst other things, that the United States failed to follow the rules which require a foreign corporation to have an office in the United States as a condition of service of an indictment and maintenance of the action violates due process.

      Page 1 2